Would you wear fruits and veggies -2?

If you can’t eat it, don’t put it on your skin

(2/2 – This article is in two parts)

5. Fruitleather

Koen Meerkerk (23) and Hugo de Boon (23) are a Rotterdam based designer duo, recently graduated from the Willem de Kooning academy in Rotterdam. With a passion for creating value to things which have been labelled useless, the duo has placed themselves in todays circular economy. Facing and solving problems from a designer’s point of view.

These graduates of the Willem de Kooning Academie in Holland decided to collect the unsold fruit from their local farmersmarkets. They then de-seed, puree, boil and dry the fruit out into thin leather sheets. From this, they create stylish pumpkin-strawberry handbags and peach lampshades.

Farmers tend to leave up to 40% of their harvest in the fields, because it does not meet the cosmetic standards for the supermarkets. Deforestation occurs frequently so that food can be grown which does meet the needs of this cosmetic standard.
In developed countries there are different reasons why produced food for the consumer is wasted. This is often due to the fact that the consumer has bought to much, or because retailers reject the food because of its appearance. 10% of all greenhouse gasses in rich countries is emitted by producing food that will never be eaten.

Using an eco-friendly process which they developed, the discarded fruit is transformed to sheets of leather-like material. In order to really get the leather look, a final finishing is applied. The Fruitleather can be coated or embedded with a print before being applied to a large variety of products which tend to use traditional leather.
Process which involves mashing, cooking and drying, is a lot cleaner then the process that traditional leather undergoes. Using natural materials, final product is a lot less harmful to both the environment and animals.

6.  Nettles: For Tea and Fabric
Using nettles to make fabric is nothing new. Nettle fibers have been found in burial sites in Denmark that date back to the Bronze Age. In Europe, Camira Fabrics, a textile firm in Yorkshire, is known for bringing those nettle fibers back. Thanks to a partnership with De Montfort University they worked to develop a fabric made partly with the crop that most consider a weed.

nettle fabrics

The resulting fabric is called Sting, made with 25% nettles and 75% wool and is certified 100% biodegradable. Now Camira has expanded that fabric into three different lines. While their fabrics are mainly intended for upholstery, nettle fabric has already been used in the fashion world, most notably by Dutch brand Brennels.

Bio Trimmings copy

The resulting fabric is called Sting, made with 25% nettles and 75% wool and is certified 100% biodegradable. Now Camira has expanded that fabric into three different lines. While their fabrics are mainly intended for upholstery, nettle fabric has already been used in the fashion world, most notably by Dutch brand Brennels.


food and fashion

Don’t Cry Over Spilled Milk, Wear It!
Around the world, over a billion tons of food gets wasted every year, which is why a lot of individuals and companies have started to take a look at how we can better put food waste to use, instead of just taking it to the landfill. Germany’s QMilk targeted milk, not the drinkable stuff, but the milk that has gone off and gets tossed in the trash instead. In Germany alone, almost 2 million tons of milk is thrown out. Developing a biopolymer from the milk protein casein, QMilk makes both a fabric, which has a silky feel and is 100% biodegradable, as well as a line of natural cosmetics from its bioplastic.

8.  Orange Fiber

Another juicy start-up can be found in Italy. Sicilian-born Adriana Santanocito has created a soft, sustainable textile out of citrus waste. Orange Fiber aims to put the 700,000 tons of waste created by the orange juice industry to good use.

Winner of an Ideas for Change Award from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.  They envision a new life for these materials, transforming them into refined, ethereal fabrics perfectly suited to Italian tradition of high-quality fabrics and high fashion.

As of today, world’s first and only brand to produce a patented material from citrus juice byproducts, repurposing them to create beautiful, sensorial materials that reshape your sartorial experience.

Fabrics are formed from a silk-like cellulose yarn that can blend with other materials. When used in its purest form, the resulting 100% citrus textile features a soft and silky hand-feel, lightweight, and can be opaque or shiny according to production needs

9. Coffee Grounds:

Coffee is not just a beverage – for many of us, it’s a way of life. But the innovative team at Singtex have taken this one step further and learned how to spin coffee into cloth.

Singtex invented the S.Café® eco-friendly coffee yarn in 2008. Made from plastic bottles and coffee grounds, this green, high-tech yarn is environmentally friendly, de-odorizing, and fast drying, UV-resistant and has many different applications. When applied to textile fibers it enhances their functionality without affecting dye performance.

No solvents are used in the production process. Nor does it require the high-temperature carbonizing treatment of conventional carbonized materials. This reduces CO2 emissions by around 2.7 kg. The technology has since been recognized by the top three invention awards in the world. (Gold and Merit Award at INPEX in Pittsburg, USA; Gold medal at iENA Nuremberg; Gold and Special award at the International Exhibitions of Inventions Geneva)

Apart from the development of eco-friendly products they invested into the construction of a precision environmentally friendly dyeing center. Green construction was incorporated into plant construction to meet the requirements of environmentally friendly design from the selection of energy supply to the selection of dyes.

This series of textiles incorporate humidity regulation, odor-control, anti-UV, fast-drying and cool-wear technologies. General applications include sports clothing, outdoor recreation clothing, home clothing, casual clothing, underwear, bed ware and accessories



The Project


Main image: pixabay.com


Would you wear Fruits and Veggies?

If you can’t eat it, don’t put it on your skin

(1/2 – This article is in two parts)

What is common between food and fashion? Nothing? Well not anymore.  Keep reading.

Keeping yourself fed and clothed are two basic necessities. If you care where your food comes from, well then start caring from where your clothes come from too because not only food, clothes are loaded with chemicals too, beyond your imagination.

Food waste is being used by designers to develop fabrics and clothes and believe me, its fashionable. Let me peel the layers for you.

  1. Leather Vs Pineapple 🙂
Goods made from leather-alternative Pinatex. Product prototypes: shoe by Camper (gold details), shoe by Puma, brown clutch bag by Ally Capellino, ywo iPhone covers by Carmen Hijosa, Backpack+ iPad cover by Smithmattias. Photograph: Linda Nylind for the Guardian

Every year, the global leather industry slaughters more than a billion animals. Along with cattle, other animals—including sheep, dogs, and cats—are killed for their skin in China. In India, cows are forced to march for days—without food or water—to their own deaths.  Cattle who collapse from exhaustion have their tails broken or chili peppers rubbed into their eyes in order to force them to keep moving.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that the incidence of leukemia among residents near a tannery in Kentucky was five times greater than the U.S. average. Turning skin into leather uses dangerous chemicals, including mineral salts, formaldehyde, and coal-tar derivatives.

Massive tracts of the Amazon and other precious rainforest are cleared each year to produce beef and leather products. This has led celebrities such as Sir Richard Branson, and Leonardo DiCaprio to call for a ‘Ban on Beef’.

Click the Peta link in the references below and you will stop wearing leather.

Here is the alternate: Piñatex. Piña is Spanish for pineapple – the new material was created by Carmen Hijosa, who worked as a consultant in the Philippines leather goods industry in the 1990s. She was unimpressed with the standard of goods produced and started to look for alternatives. It was the strength and the fineness of the pineapple leaf fibers used in the Barong Tagalog that first alerted her that there was another option. ( At weddings and formal events in the Philippines, men can often be seen wearing the Barong Tagalog, a thin and transparent embroidered garment worn over a shirt).

Innovative company Ananas Anam has replaced cows with pineapples.  Pineapple leaves are a by-product of the pineapple harvest and are often left to simply decompose. Now they’re being giving a brand new life and the process also creates an extra source of income for farming communities. With a similar appearance to canvas, it can be dyed, printed, and treated to give different types of texture. With treatment, the Piñatex can closely resemble leather while separate thicknesses are also produced, depending on the use of the finished product.

2.  Kambucha

State Library scientist Dr. Peter Musk, who heads Australia’s only kombucha bio-textile research program with the Queensland University of Technology, described it as smelly and unpredictable but sustainable.
“It’s a democratic material which meaks anyone can make it in their kitchen with a minimum amount of fuss,” he said.
Most people drink Kombucha, but the culture can also be combined with yeast to create a curd, which is then stretched and dried, turning into what has been described as “vegan leather”.
The concept was pioneered in 2003 by London-based fashion designer Suzanne Lee, whose work has since been exhibited around the world.
Dr Musk’s Brisbane-based science and design team has been perfecting ways to make hard-wearing items such as kombucha shoes and jackets a reality.

Dean Brough, the head of studies at QUT’s School of Design, said kombucha clothing was already gracing catwalks in the United States and Britain, with designers such as Sacha Laurin leading the way.

Mr Brough said kombucha fabric was the ultimate in sustainable couture. “In principle you could actually make a garment out of kombucha fabric, put it in a blender, reblend it and make another garment because it’s just a cellulose fabric,” he said.

He said there is huge potential for widespread use. “To my surprise it hasn’t been taken up on a commercial scale — I think it could be mass produced commercially relatively quickly,” he said. “The technology is very low scale — it’s really just the volume that would be required.”

Kombucha Goddess dress as seen at Paris Fashion Week 2015 | Kombucha leather and lacing grown by Sacha Laurin | Design and construction by Rebecca Wendlandt

3. Fibershed

A foodshed refers to the geographical area where food is both produced and where it is consumed, similar to a watershed. In other words, the flow from origin to ultimate destination. What if we thought about fibers in the same way? That’s the concept behind Fibershed, regional textile communities that can ensure a “full-loop textile system,” where the fiber is grown, processed, and ultimately created into a wearable within the same geographical area.

backyard hoodie

Rebecca Burgess consulted North Face on sourcing a local supply chain for their “Backyard Hoodie” (Photo by Paige Green Photography)

Rebecca Burgess, founder of the Fibershed organization which aims to build more fibershed communities, it all began by developing and wearing a prototype wardrobe whose natural dyes, fibers, and labor were sourced from a region no larger than 150 miles from the project’s headquarters. Just like we can commit to growing our own food, we can also commit to growing our own fibers, or at least having an intimate relationship with those people nearby.

4.  Permacouture: Plant a Dye Garden
A garden can sustain, but it can also help you create. Located in both London and San Francisco, organization Permacouture helps people to understand the connection between local food movements and textiles, and that plants can be used for food and fashion too. They also run a Seed to Sew project, promoting the use of heirloom seeds. Because if you have a vegetable garden, you can turn it into a dye garden. While there are common non-edible dye plants like indigo, there are many common edible plants that work well to dye with, like onion skins and red cabbage as well as flowers like sunflowers and hollyhocks.

Eat your vegetables and dye with them too? Gardening just got a whole lot more interesting.


References: https://www.peta.org/features/leather-industry/



Main image: Pixabay.com

Food You Can Wear: A Guide to Gourmet Fashion

9 Cool Projects Where Sustainable Food and Fashion Come Together


Circular Textiles Economy = Zero Waste Is it Possible?


Think Outside the Trash – Recycle

Article published in Huffington Post on October 7, 2016 states that in 2013 alone, Americans discarded 15.1 million tons of clothing and other textiles, and 85 percent of that wound up in landfills.

That’s a bad thing, and not just because your old clothes could have been reused or recycled rather than being stuck in the ground. And not just because there are better uses for the land that landfills occupy ― or because transporting textile waste to landfills is so costly.

You see, all those baggy trousers and stained shirts in landfills don’t just lie there forever. They decompose. As they do, they release landfill gas, a toxic brew of air pollutants that includes the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane.

ON POWELL/NATURE/ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY: Map showing the locations of landfills in the contiguous 48 states. Each blue dot represents a landfill. The dot’s size corresponds to the amount of waste the landfill accepted in 2013.

There are about 1,200 municipal solid waste landfills in the United States, Jon Powell, a doctoral student in chemical and environmental engineering at Yale University and an expert on landfills informs. About 900 of these have vacuum systems that collect landfill gas for burning or to produce electricity.

But a lot of landfill gas is simply vented into the atmosphere. In fact, landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions in the U.S., according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Methane is known to be 28 times more efficient than carbon dioxide at trapping heat, Powell said. That means it poses a huge global warming problem.

What’s the solution?  Reuse, recycle and never trash your clothes.

What’s the permanent solution? –  Circular Textiles Economy.

Fashion is a vibrant industry that employs hundreds of millions, generates significant revenues, and touches almost everyone, everywhere. Since the 20th century, clothing has increasingly been considered as disposable, and the industry has become highly globalized, with garments often designed in one country, manufactured in another and sold worldwide at an ever-increasing pace. This trend has been further accentuated over the past 15 years by rising demand from a growing middle class across the globe with higher disposable income, and the emergence of the ‘fast fashion’ phenomenon, leading to a doubling in production over the same period.

The time has come to transition to a textile system that delivers better economic, societal, and environmental outcomes. The report A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future outlines a vision and sets out ambitions and actions – based on the principles of a circular economy – to design out negative impacts and capture a USD 500 billion economic opportunity by truly transforming the way clothes are designed, sold, and used.

The current textiles system has major drawbacks

Currently, steady production growth is intrinsically linked to a decline in utilization per item, leading to an incredible amount of waste. It is estimated that more than half of fast fashion production is disposed of in under a year, and one garbage truck full of textiles is landfilled or burnt every second. This factor combined with a very low rate of recycling – less than 1% of material used – leads to an ever-expanding pressure on resources. This ‘take-make-dispose’ system is not only extremely wasteful, but also very polluting. The use of substances of concern in textile production has an important impact on farmers’ and factory workers’ health as well as on the surrounding environment. During use, it has been recently estimated that, half a million tons of plastic microfibers shed during washing ends up in the ocean and ultimately enters the food chain. In other words, we may end up eating our own clothes. If nothing is done, these severe weaknesses are expected to grow exponentially with dramatic environmental, societal, and economic consequences, ultimately putting industry profitability at risk.

Negative impacts of the textiles industry are set to drastically increase by 2050

Negative Impacts

A new textiles economy would lead to better outcomes

Beyond laudable ongoing efforts, a new system for the textiles economy is needed and this report proposes a vision aligned with circular economy principles. In such a model, clothes, fabric, and fibers re-enter the economy after use and never end up as waste. This vision relies on four ambitions that would lead to better economic, environmental, and social outcomes, capturing opportunities missed by the current linear textiles system.

  • Phase out substances of concern and microfiber release, by aligning industry efforts and coordinate innovation to create safe material cycles.
  • Transform the way clothes are designed, sold and used to break free from their increasingly disposable nature, by scaling up closing rental schemes; making durability more attractive; and increasing clothing utilization through brand commitments and policy.
  • Radically improve recycling by transforming clothing design, collection and reprocessing; pursuing innovation to improve the economics and quality of recycling; stimulating demand for recycling materials; and implementing clothing collection at scale.
  • Make effective use of resources and move to renewable inputs.

Creating a new textiles economy

Ambitioins New Textile Economy

So is Circular Textiles Economy possible? I think: YES

A new level of collaboration is required

Efforts are already being employed by brands, retailers, and other organizations to change the industry and although promising progress is being made, it is often too fragmented or only effective at small scale. That is why achieving a new textiles economy will demand unprecedented levels of alignment on the case for change, and collaboration. A system-level change approach is required, including rallying key industry players to set ambitious joint commitments, kick-start cross-value chain demonstrator projects, and orchestrate complementary initiatives.


See study done by Ellen Macarthur Foundation here: A NEW TEXTILES ECONOMY: REDESIGNING FASHION’S FUTURE 


Maun Image: www.metabolic.nl


Toxic Clothes


A $7 trillion/year clothing industry is manufactured using an astounding 8,000 synthetic chemicals. Nowadays clothes also contain toxins like formaldehyde, brominated flame retardants, and perfluorinated chemicals (Teflon) to provide “non-iron” and “non-wrinkle” qualities. Insecticides are even applied in the name of good health.

For half a century, skin and chemicals have been interacting and creating problems like infertility, respiratory diseases, contact dermatitis, and cancer.

The more synthetic clothing you wear, the greater your risk of absorbing toxic chemicals that harm your health. Skin is the largest body organ and when toxins are absorbed through your skin, they bypass your liver, the organ responsible for removing toxins. You also may not realize that your skin keeps you healthy by venting up to a pound of toxins per day.

Petrochemical fibers restrict and suffocate your skin shutting down toxic release. Meanwhile, they contribute to your total toxic burden and may become the “tipping point” for triggering the onset of disease.

Two contributing factors

  • Toxic buildup in your body
  • Multiple chemicals that interact together to create even worse problems than the individual chemicals by themselves.

Skin rashes, nausea, fatigue, burning, itching, headaches, and difficulty breathing are all associated with chemical sensitivity. If you have mysterious health symptoms that you can’t seem to get control over, it’s worth checking out whether your clothes could be the problem.

No parent would want toxic materials in their children’s clothing. Yet according to a new Greenpeace study, a range of hazardous chemicals is being used in the production of kids’ wear from top fashion brands.

A frequent question about producing toxin-free clothing is whether it is economically feasible for textile companies to replace hazardous chemicals with safer alternatives. The answer is resoundingly yes; doing so is essential if companies want to keep their business sustainable

Entire groups of toxic chemicals, previously ubiquitous in the supply chain, have been phased out by such companies within a short period of time – for example, biodegradable biopolymer and fluorocarbon-free water repellent materials are used as safer alternatives. More importantly, these companies have created incentives for “upstream” players in the textile supply chain, those who provide dyes and detergents, to weigh-in and start vying for a share in the market for safer alternatives.

High-end British brand Burberry was listed as the industry leader in the 2016 Down Jones Sustainability index in the ‘Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods’ sector; in addition they are also listed in the FTSE4Good Index and the MSCI Global Sustainability Index series, they are members of the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC). This opens a new chapter in the story of toxic-free fashion and raises the bar for the luxury sector. Brands such as Gucci, Versace and Louis Vuitton now risk getting left behind.

Early birds have an advantage. Across the globe regulations are kicking in that will force the textile industry to shift to toxin-free mode. More stringent regulation will be the reason that brands will eventually have to change to safer alternatives.

In 2013, the textile industry was listed for the first time under China’s national five-year plan for prevention and control of environmental risk of chemicals as a “key industry for regulatory control”. The signal sent by regulators in the worlds largest textile-producing country is very clear: no more toxic clothing in our backyard.

The central government of China is also to release a blacklist of toxic chemicals that will be subject to strict regulatory control. Some of them are major chemicals used by the textile industry.

What about the USA? Here are the requirements for fabrics – mostly applying to children:

  • Section 101(a) of the CPSIA restricts children’s products, including children’s apparel and sleepwear, to a lead content limit of 100 parts per million (ppm). In addition, the use of paint or similar surface coating on children’s apparel and sleepwear must not exceed a lead content limit of 90 ppm. That compares to the GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) requirement that the lead content be 2 ppm.
  • Section 108 of CPSIA states that children’s toys and child care articles cannot contain more that 0.1% of six phthalates – DEHP, DBP, BBP limits are applicable to both toys and child care items while DINP, DIDP, and DnOP limits are applicable only to toys that can be placed in the mouth and are intended for children 3 and younger. Although children’s clothing does not need to be certified to this requirement, children’s sleepwear or bibs (child care article) intended for children age 3 years or younger and any children’s textile product that is intended for use in play (toy) must be certified to the phthalates requirements. In comparison to GOTS, all phthalates are prohibited.
  • In July 2011, CPSC approved a federal safety rule for drawstrings in children’s upper outerwear. Children’s upper outerwear in sizes 2T-16 must be in conformance with ASTM F1816-97, Standard Safety Specification for Drawstrings on Children’s Upper Outerwear, approved June 10, 1997, published August 1998 (incorporated by reference in 16 CFR 1120.3 (b), or such outerwear will be considered a substantial product hazard.
  • Textiles used in apparel must meet class 1 or 2 flammability requirements. Children’s sleepwear must be flame resistant and self-extinguish when exposed to a small ignition source. The rules cover all children’s sleepwear between size 9 months and size 14. The fabric, seams, trim, and garments must pass certain flammability tests or the garment must be tight-fitting as defined by specified dimensions. ( See our blog post on flame retardants, published in May, 2013)

What does this mean? It means that the United States has basically no protection for consumers in terms of textiles.


  1. Just say no to sandals, shoes, boots or raingear made entirely or predominantly from rubber- or plastic-like materials. Keep an eye out when shopping for shoes treated with anti-microbial chemicals.
  2. Rid wardrobes of garments screen printed with plastisol, the thick, rubbery material used to create slightly raised designs and logos.
  3. Don’t purchase clothing promising stain-resistant, waterproof, or odor-fighting performance, technologies which utilize toxic chemicals.
  4. Steer clear of polyester, which frequently contains traces of antimony.
  5. Stick to natural fiber clothing, preferably organic.
  6. Select clothing manufactured in the U.S. and Europe where regulations are generally stricter.
  7. Don’t add insult to injury. Wash clothing in plant-based detergent without synthetic fragrance, which can contain hormone disrupting chemicals. And skip the fragrant dryer sheets.


The Organic Trade Association estimates that one non-organic cotton T-shirt uses one-third pound of pesticides and fertilizers. Cotton production uses one-fourth of all the world’s fertilizers. It’s another good reason to choose organic cotton to add to the ones above.

25 Tips for healthy wear– click here

Killer Clothes” written by Anna Maria Clement, PhD, NMD, LN and Brian R. Clement, PhD, NMD, LN


Reduce Your Fashion Footprint

“Fair is more beautiful”

“Shop Ethically” and reduce your fashion footprint.

Fashion is a powerful form of art. It’s movement, design and architecture all in one. It shows the world who we are and who we’d like to be. It is a way to express yourself.

Lot of time is spent almost every day for the desire of looking good. Many iconic celebrities in the fashion and entertainment world have made some powerful statements about style and fashion.

“I like my money right where I can see it…hanging in my closet.” —Carrie Bradshaw

“I don’t design clothes. I design dreams.” —Ralph Lauren

“I know what women want. They want to be beautiful.” —Valentino Garavani

“Style is a way to say who you are without having to speak.” —Rachel Zoe

“Whoever said that money can’t buy happiness, simply didn’t know where to go shopping.” —Bo Derek

I think, fashion does not mean buying expensive clothes or more clothes, as fast fashion suggests. It does not mean following each and every trend in the market. That’s like letting the market trends own you. Style and fashion should come from inside. What you like and the way you want to look. The statement you want to make with your clothes.  Don’t let fashion own you, rather you decide what your fashion and style is and what you want to express by the way you dress and live.

Fast fashion is a term used by retailers to express that designs move from catwalk quickly in order to capture current fashion trends.

Nothing is more disheartening for a fashion lover than to realize that their passion for clothes might have a negative impact on the rest of the world. Even casual shoppers are contributing to the problem more than they may think. The problem, to be specific, is fast fashion. By now it’s common knowledge that the booming surplus of cheap clothing is causing problems worldwide, from poor conditions for factory workers that lead to tragedies such as the collapsed factory in Bangladesh to an unsustainable toll being taken on the earth’s resources.

There is simply too much clothing being made, often in unethical ways. A century ago it was standard for someone to only own a handful of clothing, made well and repaired over and over again so that each item would last for years. Now the average person buys around 65 items of cheap clothes and discards more than 68 pounds of clothing in landfills every year. It’s not sustainable, so if you care about the earth and the people who live in it then you probably agree that it’s time to look for alternative ways to shop.
It may seem overwhelming at first, but the good news is that it’s actually very easy to make small but impactful changes to the way you shop for clothes. Below are some ways to buy ethically-

Look for the Fair Trade logo. Fair Trade U.S.A. is a non-profit organization that helps identify brands that manufacture their products ethically outside of the U.S. They measure things like working conditions and wages. If a company meets their standards you will find their stamp of approval in the form of a little green, black, and white logo of a person holding a bowl in front of the world.

  • You can also find the Fair Trade logo on food products like tea, coffee, spices, and sugar.
  • You can find the Fair Trade logo on brands like People Tree, Patagonia, and Eileen Fisher.

Look for an organic or recycled certification. The first thing that you should look for on the label is the Fair Trade logo mentioned above. The label should also tell you if the material is made out of organic or recycled material. Keep in mind that just because a product is made from organic or recycled material doesn’t mean that it is ethically made.

Rely on the guidance of websites and apps. Apps like GoodGuide and Free2Work can help you navigate brands while you are on the go. GoodGuide rates products on a scale of two to ten to help guide consumers to healthier choices. Free2Work is a tool that is used to increase transparency and give consumers the power to make informed decisions about their purchases.[6]

  • Keep these apps on your phone for use during your next shopping trip.

Know where your clothing is made. You should check the label to see where your clothing is manufactured. However, it is important to remember that the label doesn’t tell you everything about where the clothing is labeled. Even worse, sometimes the brand is dishonest with the country listed on the label. It is important to do your research instead of relying solely on the label.

  • For example, a brand that lists the country as USA may source some of their materials from China.
  • According to the Fashion Transparency Index, H&M and Levi’s are excellent at reporting this information to customers
  • Learn about clothing. You can’t exactly shop for quality, ethical clothing if you don’t know what to look for. Do a little bit of research, either just about clothing in general or a particular brand that you’re interested in. Where does the clothing comes from, who made it, and what should you look for in terms of quality are just a few questions to ask.

Support local small businesses. Speaking of shopping locally, if you have any small clothing boutiques nearby then they’re a much better bet than your local strip mall. It’s much easier to ask the owner of a small clothing boutique where they source the clothes they sell. Plus you get to feel good about supporting local businesses. Bonus points if that cute little shop on Main Street sells secondhand or handmade clothing.

Make use of fashion transparency indexes. Use The Higg Index, an assessment tool used by the fashion industry to evaluate their environmental and social responsibility, to do research about ethical brands while you are near a computer.[7] You could also refer to the Fashion Transparency Index (FTI), which is an index published yearly to rank the world’s biggest fashion brands according to their level of transparency. You can see the FTI here: http://fashionrevolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FR_FashionTransparencyIndex.pdf

Budget for high quality staples. Let’s talk about budget. When switching to an eco-conscious wardrobe, it’s not impossible to stick with the same clothing budget that you used for fast fashion—but it does require an adjustment to how you shop. Suppose you spend a certain amount of money to purchase 30 to 60 items of cheap fast-fashion clothing per year. Now, you’re more likely to spend the same amount of money purchasing only 10 to 30 new items of clothing per year. However, the quality is almost certainly going to be much better and your clothes will last longer, look better, and be worn more. Take a good look at how many fast fashion purchases you made in the past year and ask yourself if they were worthwhile investments. Wouldn’t you rather have one silk top that lasts for years instead of three polyester tops that fall apart in a year? It might be hard to adjust your shopping habits at first but it will be worth it.

Resources: www.fashionmagazine.com





Style Me Sustainable

“If it can’t be reduced, reused, repaired, rebuilt, refurbished, refinished, resold, recycled, or composted, then it should be restricted, designed or removed from production.”
Pete Seeger, Folk Singer & Social Activist

Every piece of new clothing, if not made sustainably, can be the product of countless chemicals and dyes, all of which can be harmful to the earth, air, groundwater as well as the people making the clothing and even the people who try it on and then wear it.

It’s not easy to unravel garments green credentials.

The fashion industry is the world’s second-largest polluter, after oil. That means even if you’re diligent about correctly separating your recycling, put solar panels on your roof and collect rainwater, and strictly buy local, organic produce, you’re inherently implicit in fashion’s shameful truth just by getting dressed every morning.

What’s perhaps most shocking, is how far-reaching the industry’s impact is. It touches on four major areas: waste, water, toxic chemicals and energy.

Here are some frightening statistics: the average T-shirt uses 400 to 600 gallons of water to produce (that’s equivalent to seven to 10 full bathtubs); a pair of jeans uses 1,800 gallons of water (that’s about 6,800 one-liter bottles); the fashion industry uses 1,600 chemicals in their dyeing processes, only one per cent of which have been approved by the Environmental Protection Agency; a T-shirt can travel up to 3,500 km before it lands on a consumer’s back.

But it’s not just the industry that’s at fault; consumers play a part, too. Kelly Drennan, founding executive director of Fashion Takes Action says that we consume 400 per cent more clothing today versus 20 years ago and the average garment is only worn seven times before it gets thrown out.

Fast fashion, pop culture, and traditional as well as social media have created a cult of consumerism that’s more rabid than ever before.

Drennan  says “No one wants to be seen or photographed in the same outfit, and because a lot of these clothes are made so cheaply and cost so little, it’s more convenient for consumers to dispose of their wardrobe,”

“At the same time, there’s no real education to consumers around the impact of what this level of consumption is doing to the planet.”
While most people likely donate their old clothes to charities, the ones that are ripped or stained usually get thrown out and end up in a landfill or being incinerated. But the reality is, old clothes can be shredded and ground down to make new consumer products like paper, automotive and building insulation, under padding for carpets and stuffing for pet bedding.

“Most people think of rags, but these old clothes can engage other sectors.”

There is a pressing need to transform the way clothes are made. Eliminating wasteful practices, reducing electricity, water and chemicals consumption can have a positive impact on our and planet earth’s health and wellbeing. Choice of our clothes has impact on environment therefore making intelligent and thoughtful buying decisions can help to create clothing with minimal negative impacts upon the environment, animals and human welfare.

How we as consumers care for our garments has a big impact?

Doing full loads of laundry, washing your clothes in cold water and hanging them to dry are easy ways to help reduce impact

Drennan espouses the seven Rs: reduce, reuse, recycle, rent (on websites like Rent frock Repeat and FreshRents), repurpose (YouTube is filled with videos that can show you how to transform your old clothes), repair (instead of throwing out ripped or torn garments, or ones that don’t fit as well anymore, take them to a tailor to be fixed), and most of all, research.

“Go to your favorite brand’s website and if they aren’t talking about their sustainability practices, that should be a red flag,” she says.

The Fashion Transparency Index is also a great resource to see who’s doing what right. Compiled by Fashion Revolution, a non-profit collective of designers, academics, writers, business leaders, policymakers, brands, retailers, marketers, producers, makers, workers and fashion lovers, it examines the sustainability practices of 150 top brands and retailers to educate consumers on how to shop and what to look for.

Below are some tips to make your closet sustainable and green:

Organic cotton: Conventional cotton uses tons of fertilizers. The scenario changes completely in case of organic cotton. Organic cotton uses far less water too.

 The main benefit of organic materials, however, is that the crops aren’t treated with pesticides, insecticides, herbicides and Genetically Modified Organisms.  It saves lives, is better for the environment and farming communities.

Clothes Swapping: Exchange clothing and accessories that you no longer wear (or have never worn) for someone else’s barely-worn (or never-worn) items. Shop someone else’s closet, declutter yours and build a completely new wardrobe on a budget. The clothes may not be brand new, but they’ll be new to you.

Change Laundry Habits: Wash at 30° C, no tumble dry and limited ironing will cut your clothing footprint. Running full loads of laundry in a house hold can save 99pounds of CO2 every year. Most clothing shrinking occurs as the last 5-10% of the water is driven out. If clothing is removed when it is a little bit damp, there will be less shrinkage increasing the clothing lifespan. Avoid “wash separately” clothes. Find alternates to dry cleaning or switch to organic/ natural dry cleaning places.

Quality Over Quantity: Buy less, choose well and make it last.

Recycle and Donate: Recycle your clothes, never trash. Trashed clothes go to landfills. Earth has its own clothes, does not need ours. Donate and encourage reuse.

Sustainable closets live long!


6 Toxic fabrics for skin


Martin Fox, Ph.D. author of Healthy Water for Longer Life describes that we absorb more through our skin than through ingesting. In a 15-minute bath, the average adult absorbs 63% of the elements in the water. Drinking 2 liters of water, the absorption rate of elements is only 27%.

As we can get sick with “sick” clothes, healthy clothes can make us healthier. There are several ways our skin can guard us, as it stays guard outside our body for our inner body. Skin is our bodyguard for our inside. It keeps our inside in. If our skin is not healthy it cannot protect us, it cannot breathe and regulate body temperature. Unhealthy skin cannot sweat right, invigorate and synthesis vitamin D properly.

Not that long ago, people were stuck to the natural fibers: wool, cashmere, cotton, silk, linen, and hemp.

But if you take a look at your clothing labels today, you are likely to find materials like rayon, polyester, acrylic, acetate and nylon. And your shirts and slacks may be treated to be wrinkle-free or stain resistant.

These technological advances in fabrics may make our lives simpler, but at what cost? Chemically treated natural and synthetic fabrics are a source of toxins that adversely affect your health and the health of the planet.

Here’s our short list of fabrics to avoid, and the healthy ones to pick instead.

Top 6 Toxic Fabrics

1. Polyester is the worst fabric you can buy. It is made from synthetic polymers that are made from esters of dihydric alcohol and terpthalic acid.

2. Acrylic fabrics are polycrylonitriles and may cause cancer, according to the EPA.

3. Rayon is recycled wood pulp that must be treated with chemicals like caustic soda, ammonia, acetone and sulphuric acid to survive regular washing and wearing.

4. Acetate and Triacetate are made from wood fibers called cellulose and undergo extensive chemical processing to produce the finished product.

5. Nylon is made from petroleum and is often given a permanent chemical finish that can be harmful.

6. Anything static resistant, stain resistant, permanent press, wrinkle-free, stain proof or moth repellant. Many of the stain resistant and wrinkle-free fabrics are treated with perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs), like Teflon.

Modern Materials

Keep in mind that many fabrics (including natural fibers) undergo significant processing that often involves:

  • Detergents
  • Petrochemical dyes
  • Formaldehyde to prevent shrinkage
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
  • Dioxin-producing bleach
  • Chemical fabric softeners

These additives are often toxic to the human body, may contain heavy metals and can pollute our environment.

With these kinds of warnings, what can you do?

If you are chemically sensitive or just want to surround yourself with healthy fabrics, there are new options.

The more synthetic clothing you wear, the greater your risk of absorbing toxic chemicals that harm your health. Skin is the largest body organ and when toxins are absorbed through your skin, they bypass your liver, the organ responsible for removing toxins. You also may not realize that your skin keeps you healthy by venting up to a pound of toxins per day.

Petrochemical fibers restrict and suffocate your skin shutting down toxic release. Meanwhile, they contribute to your total toxic burden and may become the “tipping point” for triggering the onset of disease.

Two contributing factors:

  1. Toxic buildup in your body
  2. Multiple chemicals that interact together to create even worse problems than the individual chemicals by themselves.

Skin rashes, nausea, fatigue, burning, itching, headaches, and difficulty breathing are all associated with chemical sensitivity. If you have mysterious health symptoms that you can’t seem to get control over, it’s worth checking out whether your clothes could be the problem.

Here’s what you can do:

Choose natural fibers.

  1. Cotton — preferably organic. It remains the “king” of textiles. Organic accounts for less than 1% of worldwide production.
  2. Flax — one of nature’s strongest fibers.
  3. Hemp — grows without any need for fungicides, herbicides, or pesticides because it’s naturally insect-resistant. Its fibers are reported to be four times stronger than cotton. This is NOT the hemp known for its mind-altering properties!
  4. Silk — known as the “queen of fabrics”. Watch out for the use of synthetic dyes in silk.
  5. Wool — most of today’s wool is contaminated with chemicals, i.e., pesticides used to kill parasites. But organic wool is becoming more common.
  6. Other — alpaca, angora, camel, cashmere, mohair, ramie, aluyot. Read more

Best is to go organic.

The Organic Trade Association estimates that one non-organic cotton T-shirt uses one-third pound of pesticides and fertilizers. Cotton production uses one-fourth of all the world’s fertilizers. It’s another good reason to choose organic cotton to add to the ones above.

25 Tips for healthy wear– click here

When we choose organic cotton clothing, we not only benefit directly from its superior comfort and durability, we also help to minimize harm to our health and the planet’s ecosystems. From seed-preparation to weed control and harvesting, organic growing methods have proven to be safer because they rely on toxic chemicals. Organic cotton involves untreated seeds, crop rotation and water retention in the soil by adding organic matter, hand removed weeds from the crops and natural biological practices for pest control.

Organic cotton represents safe and sustainable practices.  People with allergies and chemical sensitivity especially benefit from organic cotton clothing, as conventional cotton may retain harmful toxic residues. Even if you don’t have sensitive skin, organic cotton will just feel better on your skin.

Organic farming is not only safer and healthier for farmers, but also encourages just economic systems in the supply chain. It provides an economically viable and socially acceptable alternative to large-scale farming and dependence on subsidies.

So why wait, let’s make a start. Check out organic cotton clothing option next time when are you are in stores. Don’t let babies, toddlers and kids wear toxic clothes. They are soft and they need soft. Nature has given us the best option. 100% organic cotton.

Be safe buy safe.


“Killer Clothes” written by Anna Maria Clement, PhD, NMD, LN and Brian R. Clement, PhD, NMD, LN


Our genes load the gun, our lifestyle pulls the trigger

Treat your health like a job because your life depends on it- Anonymous

The true cost of an unhealthy lifestyle or little exercise, poor diet and smoking has been quantified by scientists who found that it can reduce lifespan by 23 years. People who develop largely preventable conditions like heart disease, stroke and type two diabetes are cutting their life short by decades, a 50 year study has shown.

It is estimated that around 80 per cent of cases could be prevented by keeping weight under control, exercising more, eating a healthy diet, and not smoking or drinking too much.

For a man in his 40s, suffering from all three conditions reduces life by 23 years. It means that a 40-year-old’s life expectancy would drop from 78 to just 55. Likewise someone in their 60s could lose 15 years, meaning a 60-year-old man might have just three years of life left.

The cost is far greater than smoking, which is thought to limit lifespan by 10 years.

“We showed that having a combination of diabetes and heart disease is associated with a substantially lower life expectancy,” says Dr Emanuele Di Angelantonio from the Department of Public Health and Primary Care at the University of Cambridge
“An individual in their sixties who has both conditions has an average reduction in life expectancy of about 15 years.”

The researchers analyzed data from 700,000 people who were recruited for Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (ERFC) cohort between 1960 and 2007 and 500,000 participants fro, the UK Biobank who were recruited between 2006 and 2010.

From the 1.2 million people studied, 135,000 died during the research period.

The study authors used the information to estimate reductions in life expectancy associated with different conditions including diabetes, stroke, heart attack and other diseases.

Around 134,000 cancers each year are the result of a poor lifestyle, Cancer Research UK has found.

Unhealthy lifestyles includes: Smoking, not eating right and eating lot of junk food, drug and alcohol abuse, not or little exercise, snacking when not hungry, irregular sleep habits and not sleeping enough, skipping breakfast, too much sitting, too much TV watching, unhealthy relationships, negative talking, staying annoyed all the time.

One of our most important assets is our health. If we don’t feel well, we can’t do well. How can you expect to get the absolute most out of life if your energy levels are below average, carrying around excess fat, and feeling like complete crap? You can’t! Looking good is just a benefit. It is so much deeper than simply reaping the exterior rewards. The true benefit is what happens within us when we give our bodies the attention they need.

These days its easy to get your body loaded with chemicals by not paying attention to what we are throwing inside ourselves. If you look around, you’ll see a ton of eating options that are unhealthy and how easily we toss them in our body. Then we cover ourselves with chemical filled clothes and fill our houses with all kind of chemically made products. Without even knowing, we create a heap of chemicals in and around us. That’s kind of scary.

We live in our body and we cannot take it for granted.

Almost 300 pesticides can be routinely used in non-organic farming and are often present in non-organic food. Farmers are now using pesticides and chemicals as security to meet the production targets. They are constantly planting the same crop in the same field year after year. We are now living in a world where the foods, fruits, vegetables and grains raised no longer contain enough of certain needed minerals, like magnesium for example. We are depleting the soil, which means it is now almost impossible to be nutrient sufficient.

Eat organic and wear organic. Chemically treated clothes can put your health at risk too as chemicals get absorbed through skin and while we breathe.

“Eat the Rainbow” Ideally, your diet should include 5-7 different colored vegetables and fruits in a day. In addition, 50% of the fruits and vegetables you do eat should be raw as raw foods have the most nutrients. Many people are concerned about eating enough protein, but vegetables and fruits that you should be more concerned with.

Genetic Disposition: “Our genes load the gun, our lifestyle pulls the trigger.” You might have a history of heart disease or cancer in your family, but your lifestyle is what enables that disease to come forward. By eating healthfully, you can prevent any of these predisposed issues to ever arise.

The Human Microbiome: There is a lot of research being done right now about the Microbiome and how 70% of the immune system resides in your gut.  If your gut bacteria is out of balance in any way, this can cause lots of health problems. Make sure you are taking a probiotic, especially after being on antibiotics which decimate all the bacteria in your gut.

Good Health is the greatest blessing of life. Life is a weary burden to a person of broken health. The richest man with bad health always suffers and groans. He is unhappy despite his great wealth.

People would say, in this busy life, we don’t have time. Well, it’s a tradeoff. In exchange for feeling better, having fewer medical problems, and living longer. The tradeoff is that you have to sacrifice a certain amount of time and recreational indulgencies.

Another excuse might be, we cannot motivate our brain enough to exercise. I would say: declare a war on that part of brain that produces creative excuses for not exercising and that it must be a lifetime war.

The sedentary gang like to argue that even if you exercise religiously, you could still catch a bad break and dye young. And they are right. But you must see the odds. I would say, odd are in favor of more exercise than less.

Stack the odds in your favor. Exercise moderately to continue it as a lifelong routine. Fanaticism leads to quitting while moderation gives the best chances of exercising through out life





10 habits you’ll pay for in 10 years



Chemicals…..Leave me alone!

Chemicals will not leave us alone until we shun them. They are everywhere- in us(junk food), on us (clothes) and around us(our home).  How can we shun them then? Start reading labels, get to know chemical names and don’t buy them. Its not hard, I have done it, you can do it too. If you want to know more, keep reading my blog.

As a thumb rule, eat organic, wear natural fiber clothes and natural cosmetics. Just by doing that you will not only save yourself from a ton of chemicals but also help environment and planet earth to stay clean. A little investment will go a long way and save a ton of medical expenses too.

Nicholas Kristof is an American journalist, a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes, he is a regular CNN contributor and has written an op-ed column for The New York Times since November 2001. His article published in the New York Times on February 23rd 2018 is reproduced below:

Our bodies are full of poisons from products we use every day. I know – I’ve had my urine tested for them. But before I get into all that, let’s do a quick check for poisons that might be in your body.

Here are 12 chemicals found in these everyday products

Chemical Details Found in products like
Antimicrobials Can interfere with thyroid and other hormones Colgate Total toothpaste, soap, deodorant
Benzophenones Can mimic natural hormones like estrogen Sunscreen, lotions, lip balm
Bisphenols Can mimic natural hormones like estrogen Protective lining for canned goods, hard plastic water bottles, thermal paper register receipts
1,4-dichlorobenzene Can affect thyroid hormones and may increase risk of cancer Mothballs, toilet deodorizers
Parabens Can mimic natural hormones like estrogen Cosmetics, personal care products like shampoos, hair gels, lotions
Phthalates Can disrupt male reproductive development and fertility Vinyl shower curtains, fast food, nail polish, perfume/cologne
Fragrance chemicals Can exacerbate asthma symptoms and disrupt natural hormones Perfume/cologne, cleaning products, dryer sheets, air fresheners
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) Can affect hormones, immune response in children, and may increase risk of cancer Scotchgard and other stain-resistant treatments, fast-food wrappers
Flame retardants Can affect neurodevelopment and hormone levels, and may increase risk of cancer Nail polish, foam cushioning in furniture, rigid foam insulation

Surprised? So was I when I had my urine tested for these chemicals. (A urine or blood test is needed to confirm whether you have been exposed.)

Let me stress that mine should have been clean.

Almost a decade ago, I was shaken by my reporting on a class of toxic chemicals called endocrine disruptors. They are linked to cancer and obesity and also seemed to feminize males, so that male alligators developed stunted genitalia and male smallmouth bass produced eggs.

In humans, endocrine disruptors were linked to two-headed sperm and declining sperm counts. They also were blamed for an increase in undescended testicles and in a birth defect called hypospadias, in which the urethra exits the side or base of the penis rather than the tip.

Believe me, the scariest horror stories are found in urology journals. If you’re a man, you don’t wring your hands as you read; you clutch your crotch.

So I’ve tried for years now to limit my exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Following the advice of the President’s Cancer Panel, I eat organic to reduce exposure to endocrine disruptors in pesticides. I try to store leftover meals in glass containers, not plastic. I avoid handling A.T.M. and gas station receipts. I try to avoid flame-retardant furniture.

Those are all common sources of toxic endocrine disruptors, so I figured that my urine would test pristine. Pure as a mountain creek.

Silent Spring Institute near Boston, which studies chemical safety, offers a “Detox Me Action Kit” to help consumers determine what harmful substances are in their bodies. Following instructions, I froze two urine samples (warning my wife and kids that day to be careful what food they grabbed from the freezer) and Fed-Exed them off for analysis.

By the way, the testing is for women, too. Men may wince as they read about miniaturized alligator penises, but endocrine disruptors have also been linked to breast cancer and gynecological cancers. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists warns women that endocrine disruptors can also cause miscarriages, fetal defects and much more.

As I waited for the lab results, I continued to follow the latest research. One researcher sent a bizarre video of a mouse exposed to a common endocrine disruptor doing back flips nonstop, as a kind of nervous tic.

Finally, I heard back from Silent Spring Institute. I figured this was a report card I had aced. I avoid all that harmful stuff. In my columns, I had advised readers how to avoid it.

Sure enough, I had a low level of BPA, best known because plastic bottles now often boast “BPA Free.”

But even a diligent student like me failed the test. Badly. I had high levels of a BPA substitute called BPF. Ruthann Rudel, a toxicologist who is the head of research at Silent Spring, explained that companies were switching to BPF even though it may actually be yet more harmful (it takes longer for the body to break it down). BPF is similar to that substance that made those mice do back flips.

“These types of regrettable substitutions — when companies remove a chemical that has a widely known bad reputation and substitute a little-known bad actor in its place — are all too common,” Rudel told me. “Sometimes we environmental scientists think we are playing a big game of whack-a-mole with the chemical companies.”

Sigh. I thought I was being virtuous by avoiding plastics with BPA, but I may have been causing my body even more damage.

My urine had an average level of an endocrine disruptor called triclosan, possibly from soap or toothpaste. Like most people, I also had chlorinated phenols (perhaps from mothballs in my closet).

I had a high level of a flame retardant called triphenyl phosphate, possibly from a floor finish, which may be “neurotoxic.” Hmm. Whenever you see flaws in my columns, that’s just my neurotoxins at work.

My lab results: high levels of four chemicals were found

Chemical Details Found in products like
1,4-dichlorobenzene Can affect thyroid hormones and may increase risk of cancer Mothballs, toilet deodorizers
Antimicrobials Can interfere with thyroid and other hormones Colgate Total toothpaste, soap, deodorant
Bisphenols Can mimic natural hormones like estrogen Protective lining for canned goods, hard plastic water bottles, thermal paper register receipts
Flame retardants Can affect neurodevelopment and hormone levels, and may increase risk of cancer Nail polish, foam cushioning in furniture, rigid foam insulation
Benzophenones Can mimic natural hormones like estrogen Sunscreen, lotions, lip balm
Parabens Can mimic natural hormones like estrogen Cosmetics, personal care products like shampoos, hair gels, lotions

Notes: Benzophenones and parabens were also found, but in lower levels than in most Americans. Tests for phthalates and fragrance chemicals were not included.

Will these endocrine disruptors give me cancer? Make me obese? Make my genitals fall off? Nobody really knows. At least I haven’t started doing random back flips yet.

The steps I took did help, and I recommend that others consult consumer guides at ewg.org to reduce their exposures to toxic chemicals. Likewise, if I had downloaded the Detox Me smartphone app, I would have known to get rid of those mothballs, along with air fresheners and scented candles. (Science lesson: A less fragrant house means cleaner pee.)

Yet my takeaway is also that chemical industry lobbyists have rigged the system so that we consumers just can’t protect ourselves adequately.

“You should not have to be a Ph.D toxicologist to be safe from so many of the chemicals in use,” Dr. Richard Jackson of U.C.L.A. told me. “So much of what we are exposed to is poorly tested and even less regulated.”

The Trump administration has magnified the problem by relaxing regulation of substances like chlorpyrifos, Dow Chemical’s nerve gas pesticide. The swamp has won.

So the saddest lesson is that even if you understand the peril and try to protect yourself and your family — as I strongly suggest you do — your body may still be tainted. The chemical companies spend tens of millions of dollars lobbying and have gotten the lightest regulation that money can buy.

They are running the show, and we consumers are their lab mice.

Conventional Cotton Clothes Vs Organic Cotton Clothes

“I try to apply the organic concept to my clothes and bedding as well. There’s nothing like swimming in organic cotton sheets” – Woody Harrelson

Conventional Cotton Clothes Vs Organic Cotton Clothes

Readers will find information on organic cotton on my blog articles, here is conventional cotton clothing versus organic cotton clothing facts.

Conventional Cotton Clothes Organic Cotton Clothes
Ø  Conventional cotton clothes are mostly made from GMO cotton.

Ø  Conventional cotton clothes are made from cotton grown with seeds treated to fungicide and insecticides

Ø  Conventional cotton clothes are made from cotton grown with the use of synthetic and toxic fertilizers and pesticides. Use arial sprays.

Ø  Conventional cotton clothes are made from cotton grown using methods and materials that are harmful for the environment.

Ø  Due to heavy fertilizer and pesticides use soil devoid of all organic matter that depletes and degrades soil’s value. Some of the most toxic pesticides are used for cotton crop cultivation.

Ø  Conventional cotton clothes are made from cotton that promotes mono-crop culture and leads to loss of soil

Ø  Conventional cotton destroys weeds by the use of chemicals

Ø  Conventional cotton large amount of water for cultivation and considered as intensive irrigation crop.

Ø  Convention cotton crop growing methods are harmful to agricultural communities because of the use of most toxic chemicals as fertilizers and pesticides.

Ø  Due to toxins used to grow conventional cotton, it kills the natural habitation.

Ø  Defoliation is done with the help of chemicals.

Ø  Conventional cotton does not need any third party certification as it uses no special methods for production.  

Ø  Conventional cotton is grown on regular farmland

Ø  Extensive run off of soil and chemicals ends up in the rivers and fresh water sources.  This leads to nitrogen contaminated lakes, rivers, and oceans which causes death of fish and other aquatic species

Ø  Conventional cotton clothes are mostly treated with conventional dyes and chemicals while processing the fabric.

Ø  Conventional cotton clothes are cheaper compared to organic cotton clothes because of mass production methods used for cotton crop and clothing production.

Ø  Top ten conventional cotton growing countries in order of rank are China, India, United States, Pakistan, Brazil, Uzbekistan, Australia, Turkey, Turkmenistan and Greece.

Ø  Organic cotton clothes are never made from GMO cotton

Ø  Organic cotton clothes are made from cotton grown with untreated seeds

Ø  Organic cotton clothes are made from cotton grown without the use of toxic fertilizers and pesticides, instead natural methods of fertilizing are used.

Ø  Organic cotton clothes are made from cotton grown using methods and materials that have a low impact on the environment.

Ø  Organic cotton production systems replenish and maintain soil fertility, reduce the use of toxic and persistent pesticides and fertilizers, and build biologically diverse agriculture.

Ø  Organic cotton clothes are made from cotton that promotes crop rotation and builds strong, and fertile soil.

Ø  Organic cotton control weeds by physical removal and hand hoeing.

Ø  Organic cotton uses lesser amount of water as compared to conventional cotton. More organic matter in soil helps retain water.

Ø  Organic cotton growing methods are health friendly to agricultural community. They do not pose harm to human life as natural ways are used to cultivate the crops. 

Ø  Natural means used to grow organic cotton helps natural habitat growth.

Ø  Organic cotton crops use natural ways for defoliation.

Ø  Third-party certification verify that organic producers use methods and materials allowed in organic production.

Ø   Organic cotton crop needs the land to be detoxified for cultivation

Ø  For organic cotton crops, farmers use organic methods, which has a positive impact on our earth by saving ecosystems, soil fertility, and our health.

Ø  Organic cotton clothes are treated with non-toxic and low impact dyeing methods. Fabric is free from toxic finishes likes formaldehyde etc. and are safer for the sensitive skin people.

Ø  Organic cotton is more expensive than conventional cotton because its production takes more time, skill, and hands-on labor

Ø  Organic cotton was grown in 20 countries worldwide in 2010-11 led by India and including (in order of rank): Syria, China, Turkey, United States, Tanzania, Egypt, Mali, Kyrgyzstan, Peru, Pakistan, Uganda, Burkina Faso, Benin, Paraguay, Israel, Tajikistan, Brazil, Nicaragua, and Senegal. Approximately 219,000 farmers grew the fiber. According to the 2014 Organic Market Report from Textile Exchange, global sales of organic cotton products reached an estimated $15.7 billion in 2014, up 10 percent from 2013.

See report for conventional cotton production statics.

See report for organic cotton production statics.

To be sure a product really is organic from field to finished product, look out for below symbols:

  GOTS symbol: Product grown and processed to organic standards. Products carrying the GOTS symbol are made from organic fibers, have met strict environmental and social criteria during processing and have been certified by an independent, third party along the whole supply chain.
Find out more about GOTS…
  Soil Association symbol: Product certified to the Global Organic Textile Standard by Soil Association Certification Ltd. The Soil Association was a founder member of GOTS and is a quarter owner of Global Standard GmbH which manages the GOTS.
Find out more about the Soil Association…
  OE100 symbol: Cotton in the product grown to organic standards. Product has been tracked and traced along the supply chain by an independent, third party. Contains 100% certified organic cotton fiber, but hasn’t necessarily been processed to organic standards.
  OE blended symbol: Product contains a minimum 5% of organic cotton fiber.

Organic cotton clothing will cause fewer allergies, reduced respiratory problems Organic crops are generally far more flavorful, since they contain many more nutrients. A person’s mouth can actually taste the difference between God’s goodness and man’s folly. For the environmentalists out there, growing organically embraces the ideal that agriculture should meet the needs of the present without harming future generations.



Image: eternalriders.com


Healthy Wear